Expected fine function

V(n) = the expected fine function for violating safety and health standards, V >0, and c = total fixed costs. 

Spectroscopic analyzers come in a variety of forms and designs, according to the environment in which they will he expected to function, hut more with respect to the nature of the use to which they will be put. These range from machines for routine analysis of a limited range of materials and properties at the low end of the scale, to the complex machines used in high-end research that must be capable of extreme sensitivity and finely detailed analysis. 

In the design of a fine chemicals plant equally important to the choice and positioning of the equipment is the selection of its size, especially the volume of the reaction vessels. Volumes of reactors vary quite widely, namely between 1,000 and 10,000 L, or ia rare cases 16,000 L. The cost of a production train ready for operation iacreases as a function of the 0.7 power. The personnel requirement iacreases at an even lower rate. Thus a large plant usiag large equipment would be expected to be more economical to mn than a small one. 

PCu(ci,q) is clearly not a 5-function as has been suggested. Many more LSMS calculations would have to be done in order to determine the structure of Pcn(ci,q) for fee alloys in detail, but it is easier to see the structure in the conditional probability for bcc alloys. The probability Pcu(q) for finding a charge between q and q-t-dq on a Cu site in a bcc Cu-Zn alloy and three conditional probabilities Pcu(ci,q) are shown in Fig. 6. These functions were obtained, as for the fee case, by averaging the LSMS data for the bcc alloys with five concentrations. The probability function is not a uniform function of q, but the structure is not as clear-cut as for the fee case. The conditional probabilities Pcu(ci,q) are non-zero over a wider range than they are for the fee alloys, and it can be seen clearly that they have fine structure as well. Presumably, each Pcu(ci,q) can be expressed as a sum of probabilities with two conditions Pcu(ci,C2,q), but there is no reason to expect even those probabilities to be 5-functions. 

The copper EXAFS of the ruthenium-copper clusters might be expected to differ substantially from the copper EXAFS of a copper on silica catalyst, since the copper atoms have very different environments. This expectation is indeed borne out by experiment, as shown in Figure 2 by the plots of the function K x(K) vs. K at 100 K for the extended fine structure beyond the copper K edge for the ruthenium-copper catalyst and a copper on silica reference catalyst ( ). The difference is also evident from the Fourier transforms and first coordination shell inverse transforms in the middle and right-hand sections of Figure 2. The inverse transforms were taken over the range of distances 1.7 to 3.1A to isolate the contribution to EXAFS arising from the first coordination shell of metal atoms about a copper absorber atom. This shell consists of copper atoms alone in the copper catalyst and of both copper and ruthenium atoms in the ruthenium-copper catalyst. 

Some degree of fractionation as function of distance from the power station smoke stack is to be expected coarse particles will fall out in the immediate vicinity of the power station, whereas fine fly ash will be transported further, and gaseous emissions might be expected to be transported the furthest. Thus, from the point of view of environmental health, not only the chemical composition of emitted particles and aerosols, but also their size, is relevant (Teinemaa et al. 2002). As particulate matter is dominated by basic oxides (e.g., CaO) and gaseous emissions by acidic gases (e.g., CO2, SO2), this fractionation will influence the pH of... 

Higher-order spin terms are then added when the spacing of the fine structure is found to be a function of the magnetic field. In what follows we shall characterize each material by the value for D and E, and indicate by D that higher order terms were required. The analysis of spectra for the quantitative values of small terms is difficult, particularly when some expected lines have not been observed, and the associated errors hard to determine, so it is best to consult the original papers for terms beyond D and E. 

---