Error function, description

The stochastic description of barrierless relaxations by Bagchi, Fleming, and Oxtoby (Ref. 195 and Section IV.I) was first applied by these authors to TPM dyes to explain the observed nonexponential fluorescence decay and ground-state repopulation kinetics. The experimental evidence of an activation energy obs < Ev is also in accordance with a barrierless relaxation model. The data presented in Table IV are indicative of nonexponential decay, too. They were obtained by fitting the experiment to a biexponential model, but it can be shown50 that a fit of similar quality can be obtained with the error-function model of barrierless relaxations. Thus, r, and t2 are related to r° and t", but, at present, we can only... 

The evaluation of D by fitting an error function, which is based upon an undisturbed diffusion model in a single component system, will not lead to a proper description of the fluorine uptake in a natural multi-component system. 

In the past various attempts have been made to determine the property functions for all kinds of products. Almost all of these use linear regression techniques (see for example Powers and Moskovitz, 1974) to deal with the measured data. By the fact that most of the property function is highly non-linear, these techniques fail. In addition to the linear regression, a linear regression on non-linear functions of the attributes can be used. The drawback is that the non-linear functions of the attributes have to be defined by the user. At present this have to be done by traH-and-error and turns out to be a very tedious. Based on the above observations, a successful approach to determine the property function has to be based on a generic non-linear function description. One such approach is to use neural networks as a non-linear describing function. 

Trial wavefunctions are usually constructed by linear combination of Gaussian error functions that are convenient to integrate. The results can be of predictive value and such calculations have become everyday tools for chemists in all branches of chemistry, to guide experiments and not least to rule out untenable hypotheses. This is a remarkable achievement that seemed to be out of reach a few decades ago. Still, simple qualitative models that are amenable to perturbation theory are required to understand and predict trends in a series of related compounds. Our goal here is to describe the minimal quantum mechanical models that can still provide a useful qualitative description of electronically excited states, their electronic stmcture and their reactivity. Such models also provide a language to convey the results of state-of-the-art, but essentially black-box ab initio calculations. 

The error function owes its name to its application in statistics, where it is used in the description and characterization of measurement errors. However, the error function and its cousin, the complementary error function, are frequently... 

The above description of learning indicates the crucial importance of the errors of the vector F(Xj) of the actual activities of the output neurons and the vector yj of their desired activities, captured by means of a nonnegative function E on pairs of vectors in the o-dimensional output space. Quite a large number of such functions has already been proposed, due to the fact that most of them are applicable only in specific situations. Nevertheless, two of them are universally applicable. The most frequently encountered error function is based simply on the usual (i.e.. Euclidean) distance in the output space, i.e. on the distance induced by the Euclidean norm. From the computational point of view, however, more advantageous than the Euclidean norm itself is its square, since this can be quickly computed as the sum of squares of individual components. Therefore, this most common error function is called sum of squared errors (SSE) ... 

The Brueckner-reference method discussed in Section 5.2 and the cc-pvqz basis set without g functions were applied to the vertical ionization energies of ozone [27]. Errors in the results of Table IV lie between 0.07 and 0.17 eV pole strengths (P) displayed beside the ionization energies are approximately equal to 0.9. Examination of cluster amplitudes amd elements of U vectors for each ionization energy reveals the reasons for the success of the present calculations. The cluster operator amplitude for the double excitation to 2bj from la is approximately 0.19. For each final state, the most important operator pertains to an occupied spin-orbital in the reference determinant, but there are significant coefficients for 2h-p operators. For the A2 case, a balanced description of ground state correlation requires inclusion of a 2p-h operator as well. The 2bi orbital s creation or annihilation operator is present in each of the 2h-p and 2p-h operators listed in Table IV. Pole strengths are approximately equal to the square of the principal h operator coefiScient and contributions by other h operators are relatively small. 

---