Error estimates

In addition to what has been said above about achieving a good approximation to the solution vector, x in Ax = b, it is necessary to add a few more 

It is not unreasonable to expect that if i is an approximation to the solution X, then the residual r = A i — b should have the property that the norm, r is small such that the norm of the difference, x—jc would be small. Quite often, this is exactly the case. However, certain systems occurring in practice fail to display this behavior. For example, the system given by 

Using matrix property 8, given in the Appendix A (Equation A.20), we can evaluate the norm of the vector r to be r =. 0002. Even though 

This example demonstrates what can happen when we approximate the solution to a system representing two almost parallel lines. The point (3, 0) lies on one line Xj + 2x2 = 3 and is very close to the other line given by l.OOOlxi + 2x2 = 3.0001, but is very different from the actual intersection point (1, 1). 

Generally, the system geometry may not be available to help us determine a priori when problems might occur therefore, we must find an alternative. Such help can be obtained from the norms of the matrix A and its inverse [5,16,19,20]. In this section, we will use the norm as opposed to the I2 norm for matrices (as opposed to vectors) where 

---

In applications, one is often interested in approximating time averages over a time interval [0, T] via associated mean values of a , k = 1. ..Tfr. For T (or r) small enough, the above backward analysis may lead to much better error estimates than the worst case estimates of forward analysis. 

Unfortunately, this local error Cr cannot be calculated, since we do not know the exact solution to the QCMD equations. The clue to this problem is given by the introduction of an approximation to Let us consider another discrete evolution with an order q > p and define an error estimation via er t + z i) - z t). 

The error estimate approximates the error of the propagation with the less accurate method p. Nonetheless, the next step is started with the more precise result of... 

In [13], an efficient residual error estimation scheme has been introduced for controlling the quality of the approximation. This gives us a stopping criterion for the iteration guaranteeing that the quality of the approximation fits to the accuracy requirements of the stepsize control. 

A different long-time-step method was previously proposed by Garci a-Archilla, Sanz-Serna, and Skeel [8]. Their mollified impulse method, which is based on the concept of operator splitting and also reduces to the Verlet scheme for A = 0 and admits second-order error estimates independently of the frequencies of A, reads as follows when applied to (1) ... 

Deserno M and C Holm 1998b. How to Mesh Up Ewald Sums. II. An Accurate Error Estimate for the Particle-Particle-Particle-Mesh Algorithm. Journal of Chemical Physics 109 7694-7701. 

We consider penalized operator equations approximating variational inequalities. For equations with strongly monotonous operators we construct an iterative method, prove convergence of solutions, and obtain error estimates. 

Variations in measurable properties existing in the bulk material being sampled are the underlying basis for samphng theory. For samples that correctly lead to valid analysis results (of chemical composition, ash, or moisture as examples), a fundamental theoiy of sampling is applied. The fundamental theoiy as developed by Gy (see references) employs descriptive terms reflecting material properties to calculate a minimum quantity to achieve specified sampling error. Estimates of minimum quantity assumes completely mixed material. Each quantity of equal mass withdrawn provides equivalent representation of the bulk. 

Systematic Operating Errors Fifth, systematic operating errors may be unknown at the time of measurements. Wriile not intended as part of daily operations, leaky or open valves frequently result in bypasses, leaks, and alternative feeds that will add hidden bias. Consequently, constraints assumed to hold and used to reconcile the data, identify systematic errors, estimate parameters, and build models are in error. The constraint bias propagates to the resultant models. 

Here, 7 runs over all simulations and k, I run over all bins. These equations can be solved iteratively, assuming an initial set oi fj (e.g., fj =1), then calculating p°i from Eq. (34) and updating Ihe fj by Eq. (35), and so on, until thep°i no longer vary, i.e., the two equations are self-consistent. Erom the p°i = P(qt, sp and Eq. (27), one then obtains the free energy of each bin center (q, sp. Error estimates are also obtained [46]. The method can be applied to a one-dimensional reaction coordinate or generalized to more than two dimensions and to cases in which simulations are run at several different temperatures [46]. It also applies when the reaction coordinates are alchemical coupling coordinates (see below and Ref. 47). 

A trial and error estimate is made for determining the diameter of the flare header based upon the maximum relieving flare load and considering the back pressure limitation of 10 percent for conventional valves and 40 percent for balanced type valves. Note, however, a single main header in most cases turns out to be too large to be economically feasible. Line sizing procedures are discussed in detail in the next subsection. 

Every measured quantity or component in the main equations, Eqs. (12.30) and (12.31), influence the accuracy of the final flow rate. Usually a brief description of the estimation of the confidence limits is included in each standard. The principles more or less follow those presented earlier in Treatment of Measurement Uncertainties. There are also more comprehensive error estimation procedures available.These usually include, beyond the estimation procedure itself, some basics and worked examples. 

Similarly, the network predicted data must be unsealed for error estimation with the experimental output data. The unsealing was performed using a simple linear transformation to each data point. 

Neville s algorithm constructs the same unique interpolating polynomial and improves the straightforward Lagrange implementation by the addition of an error estimate. 

Truncation error estimates can be made to determine if the step size should be reduced or increased. For example, for the Hamming method,... 

Consider now a situation in which the bias limits in the temperature measurements are uncorrelated and are estimated as 0.5 °C, and the bias limit on the specific heat value is 0.5%. The estimated bias error of the mass flow meter system is specified as 0.25% of reading from 10 to 90% of full scale. According to the manufacturer, this is a fixed error estimate (it cannot be reduced by taking the average of multiple readings and is, thus, a true bias error), and B is taken as 0.0025 times the value of m. For AT = 20 °C, Eq. (2.9) gives ... 

Phillips, G. R., and Eyring, E. M., Error Estimation Using the Sequential Simplex Method in Nonlinear Least Squares Data Analysis, Anal. Chem. 60, 1988, 738-741. 

Temperature difference in the reactor was less important than in the Dewar vessel because of the efhdent exchange with the utility stream. That is the reason error estimation in the reactor is higher than in the Dewar vessel. 

However, the relaxation contributions obtained from Eq. 22 were not satisfactorily compared with those obtained from specific, deuterium-substitution experiments and single- and double-selective relaxation-rates. Moreover, the errors estimated for the triple-pulse experiments were very much larger than those observed for the other techniques. This point will be discussed next. 

The accuracy of the error equations (Eqs. (22) and (23)] also depends on the selected wavelet. A short and compactly supported wavelet such as the Haar wavelet provides the most accurate satisfaction of the error estimate. For longer wavelets, numerical inaccuracies are introduced in the error equations due to end effects. For wavelets that are not compactly supported, such as the Battle-Lemarie family of wavelets, the truncation of the filters contributes to the error of approximation in the reconstructed signal, resulting in a lower compression ratio for the same approximation error. 

The discretization error Cd for finite integration limits yi and y2 contains in addition to (D.8) two extra terms (under the sum) that contain incomplete Gamma functions. We don t need their explicit form for the estimation of the dominating part of the overall error. Of course, expanding these extra terms in powers of h would lead to the error estimation (A.4), that holds for extremely small h (and sufficiently small /) which is rather irrelevant in the present context. 

Beck, B., Breindl, A., Qark, T. QM/NN QSPR models with error estimation vapor pressure and log P. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40,1046-1051. 

R. Tibshirani, A comparison of some error estimates for neural network models. Neural Computation, 8(1995) 152-163. 

WHEN FmST ORDER ERROR ESTIMATION IS INADEQUATE... 

Obtained in the reaction of the amine and the parent phosphazene. Error estimated as <5%. 

The error-free likelihood gain, V,( /i Z2) gives the probability distribution for the structure factor amplitude as calculated from the random scatterer model (and from the model error estimates for any known substructure). To collect values of the likelihood gain from all values of R around Rohs, A, is weighted with P(R) ... 

---