Equations for mean activity coefficients

Note that in all ion interaction approaches, the equation for mean activity coefficients can be split up to give equations for conventional single ion activity coefficients in mixtures, e.g., Eq. (6.1). The latter are strictly valid only when used in combinations that yield electroneutrality. Thus, while estimating medium effects on standard potentials, a combination of redox equilibria with H " + e 5112(g) is necessary (see Example 3). 

Deviations from predicted behaviour are here interpreted in terms of solvation, but other factors such as ion association may also be involved. Ion association leads to deviations in the opposite direction and so compensating effects of solvation and ion association may come into play. The deviations may also be absorbing inadequacies of the Debye-Hiickel model and theory, and so no great reliance can be placed on the actual numerical value of the values emerging. This major method has now been superseded by X-ray diffraction, neutron diffraction, NMR and computer simulation methods. The importance of activity measurements may lie more in the way in which they can point to fundamental difficulties in the theoretical studies on activity coefficients and conductance. The estimates of ion size and hydration studies could well provide a basis for another interpretation of conductance and activity data, or to modify the theoretical equations for mean activity coefficients and molar conductivities. 

In these treatments, the hydration index h was treated as a constant. It is, however, reasonable to expect h to decrease as the ionic strength increases. Indeed, Bates (1986) found support for a linear decrease with I from its limiting value (h ) at zero ionic strength (63). His modification of the hydration equation for mean activity coefficients is as follows ... 

---

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ , ]

---