Equal time density correlation function calculation

First of all, let us discuss the case of equal concentrations nA(t) = nB(t) = n t) when two kinds of similar correlation functions coincide Xjj r,t) = X r,t), u = A,B. In Fig. 5.2 the concentration development in the one-dimensional case is presented [26]. The curve (a) gives averaged (over 10 simulations) computer-calculated density. Stripped lines demonstrate dispersion of results they correspond to the curves n t)) s t), where ( (0) is standard deviation. Curve (b) shows the numerical solution of a set (4.1.19), (4.1.28), and (5.1.14) to (5.1.16) derived in the framework of the superposition approximation. Curve (c) gives results of the linear approximation (4.1.41) and (4.1.42). At last, the additional curve (d) is drawn Just to illustrate concentration behaviour at short times. In the linear approximation we neglect similar reactant correlation, X r,t) — 1, whereas in curve (d) dissimilar (AB) reactant correlations (4.1.40) are also... 

The many-body ground and excited states of a many-electron system are unknown hence, the exact linear and quadratic density-response functions are difficult to calculate. In the framework of time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) [46], the exact density-response functions are obtained from the knowledge of their noninteracting counterparts and the exchange-correlation (xc) kernel /xcCf, which equals the second functional derivative of the unknown xc energy functional ExcL i]- In the so-called time-dependent Hartree approximation or RPA, the xc kernel is simply taken to be zero. 

The accuracy obtained in all cases depends on the details of the method used. The most accurate calculations are those obtained by HF methods with full correlation energy corrections. (The correlation energy is defined as the difference between the HF energy and the exact energy.) But these are only practical for very small values of N, since computer times now scale as N. The best DFT methods available at present are equal to the best practical HF-based methods available that is, there is some correlation energy included. At the same time the computer time required is 10 to 100 times less for DFT calculations, depending on N. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that density functional theory will almost completely replace wave function theory in the area of ab-initio calculations on molecules. 

This chapter is organized as follows. In section 1.1, we introduce our notation and present the details of the molecular and mesoscale simulations the expanded ensemble-density of states Monte Carlo method,and the evolution equation for the tensor order parameter [5]. The results of both approaches are presented and compared in section 1.2 for the cases of one or two nanoscopic colloids immersed in a confined liquid crystal. Here the emphasis is on the calculation of the effective interaction (i.e. potential of mean force) for the nanoparticles, and also in assessing the agreement between the defect structures found by the two approaches. In section 1.3 we apply the mesoscopic theory to a model LC-based sensor and analyze the domain coarsening process by monitoring the equal-time correlation function for the tensor order parameter, as a function of the concentration of adsorbed nanocolloids. We present our conclusions in Section 1.4. 

The values of / were calculated from the experimental data and correlated as a function of a modified Reynolds number, fie = (r F where p/ = viscosity of foam. In making the correlation it was assumed (1) that the average foam density was one-third the density of the normal liquid, (2) that the viscosity of the foam, p/, was one-third the true viscosity of the liquid, and (3) that Lo was equal to two times the hydrostatic head in the outlet calming section. Thus,... 

---