Electrostatic interactions reaction

Selective binding Proximity effects Entropy effects Electrostatic interactions Reaction field changes... 

In the reaction field method, the space surrounding a dipolar molecule is divided into two regions (i) a cavity, within which electrostatic interactions are sunnned explicitly, and (ii) a surrounding medium, which is assumed to act like a smooth continuum, and is assigned a dielectric constant e. Ideally, this quantity will be... 

In this section the influence of micelles of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) and dodecyl heptaoxyethylene ether (C12E7) on the Diels-Alder reaction of 5.1a-g with 5.2 in the absence of Lewis-add catalysts is described (see Scheme 5.1). Note that the dienophiles can be divided into nonionic (5.1a-e), anionic (5.If) and cationic (5.1g) species. A comparison of the effect of nonionic (C12E7), anionic (SDS) and cationic (CTAB) micelles on the rates of their reaction with 5.2 will assess of the importance of electrostatic interactions in micellar catalysis or inhibition. 

Other reactions are controlled kinetically, and the most stable product is not the major one observed. In these cases, you must look at the reactant side of the reaction coordinate to discover factors determining the outcome. Klopman and Salem developed an analysis of reactivity in terms of two factors an electrostatic interaction approximated by atomic charges and a Frontier orbital interaction. Fleming s book provides an excellent introduction to these ideas. 

Tacticity of products. Most solid catalysts produce isotactic products. This is probably because of the highly orienting effect of the solid surface, as noted in item (1). The preferred isotactic configuration produced at these surfaces is largely governed by steric and electrostatic interactions between the monomer and the ligands of the transition metal. Syndiotacticity is mostly produced by soluble catalysts. Syndiotactic polymerizations are carried out at low temperatures, and even the catalyst must be prepared at low temperatures otherwise specificity is lost. With polar monomers syndiotacticity is also promoted by polar reaction media. Apparently the polar solvent molecules compete with monomer for coordination sites, and thus indicate more loosely coordinated reactive species. 

The continuum model, in which solvent is regarded as a continuum dielectric, has been used to study solvent effects for a long time [2,3]. Because the electrostatic interaction in a polar system dominates over other forces such as van der Waals interactions, solvation energies can be approximated by a reaction field due to polarization of the dielectric continuum as solvent. Other contributions such as dispersion interactions, which must be explicitly considered for nonpolar solvent systems, have usually been treated with empirical quantity such as macroscopic surface tension of solvent. 

It IS likely that the syn selectivity exhibited in cycloadditions of fluoroallene IS due to electrostatic interactions [23 25] As in the case of difluoroallene the reactions of fluoroallene with diazoalkanes and nitrile oxides are facile, but such reactions, other than that shown in equation 18, are neither regio nor stereospeutic [23, 25] Indeed, the addition of phenylnitrile oxide to fluoroallene occurs with preferential anti addition for both regioisomenc products (equation 20)... 

The favorability of acid-base reactions is affected, in pa by electrostatic interactions between charged atoms a dipoles within the same molecule. The equilibrium w shift in the direction of an ion that is stabilized 1 intramolecular ion-dipole interactions. 

Electrostatic interactions can guide alkylation under certain conditions. Examine the electrostatic potential map of the potassium enolate of ethyl acetoacetate. Is carbon or oxygen more electron rich Are electrostatic interactions likely to favor addition of oxygen or carbon Examine atomic charges and electrostatic potential maps for diethylsulfate, ethyl chloride, ethyl bromide and ethyl iodide, pay attention to the backside of the electrophilic carbon. Order the systems from most to least electron poor. Which reaction is most likely to be guided by electrostatics Least likely Can the experimental results be fully explained on this basis ... 

Is the second step of the overall reaction for R=Me (N-methylphthalimide + hydrazine —> phthalimide hydrazide + methylamine) exothermic or endothermic Will higher temperatures accelerate or inhibit the reaction Is the structure drawn above for phthalimide hydrazide its lowest-energy form or are either the imine or diimine tautomers preferred Compare energies for the hydrazide and imine and diimine tautomers. Examine the geometry of phthalimide hydrazide and any low energy tautomer, and draw the Lewis structure(s) that best describes it. Can your Lewis structures account for the energy differences Examine electrostatic potential maps for all three molecules. Which molecule(s) are stablized by favorable electrostatic interactions Which are destabilized Can this help explain the energy differences Elaborate. 

Electrostatic interactions play a significant role in determining the rates of Diels-Alder reactions. 

Honk et al. concluded that this FMO model imply increased asynchronicity in the bond-making processes, and if first-order effects (electrostatic interactions) were also considered, a two-step mechanisms, with cationic intermediates become possible in some cases. It was stated that the model proposed here shows that the phenomena generally observed on catalysis can be explained by the concerted mechanism, and allows predictions of the effect of Lewis acid on the rates, regioselectivity, and stereoselectivity of all concerted cycloadditions, including those of ketenes, 1,3-dipoles, and Diels-Alder reactions with inverse electron-demand [2],... 

Electron-electron repulsion integrals, 28 Electrons bonding, 14, 18-19 electron-electron repulsion, 8 inner-shell core, 4 ionization energy of, 10 localization of, 16 polarization of, 75 Schroedinger equation for, 2 triplet spin states, 15-16 valence, core-valence separation, 4 wave functions of, 4,15-16 Electrostatic fields, of proteins, 122 Electrostatic interactions, 13, 87 in enzymatic reactions, 209-211,225-228 in lysozyme, 158-161,167-169 in metalloenzymes, 200-207 in proteins ... 

In the same manner, the rc-electron densities of the monomer and the cation are affected. Substituents, which decrease the electron density at the P-C-atom, that is, the place of the primary attack on the double bond, increase the positive charge at the a-C-atom of the cation and therefore its electrostatic interaction with a negative reaction centre (qa(cation) = —2.08 + 2.53qp(monomer) r = 0.93 n = 13). The previous equation shows that the electron density of the cation is more influenced than that of the monomer (Aqp(monomer) = 0.1 and Aqjcation) = 0.25).. 

Keywords it-Facial selectivity, a/ir Interaction, CH/ir Interaction, Ciplak effect, Diels-AIder reaction, Electrostatic interaction, Orbital mixing rule. Orbital phase environment, Secondary orbital interaction, Steric repulsion, Torsional control... 

---