Electronic state parameters

The exciton model of linear aggregates was used to explain the evolution of the electronic state parameters with stepwise incorporation of additional monomer units [64,408,409]. In this model, the transition dipole moments have only one component directed along the main molecular axis. Thus, the amplitude of the transition dipole moment is expressed by Eq. (47) for nc< 12. 

There are significant differences between tliese two types of reactions as far as how they are treated experimentally and theoretically. Photodissociation typically involves excitation to an excited electronic state, whereas bimolecular reactions often occur on the ground-state potential energy surface for a reaction. In addition, the initial conditions are very different. In bimolecular collisions one has no control over the reactant orbital angular momentum (impact parameter), whereas m photodissociation one can start with cold molecules with total angular momentum 0. Nonetheless, many theoretical constructs and experimental methods can be applied to both types of reactions, and from the point of view of this chapter their similarities are more important than their differences. 

Figure Bl.22.4. Differential IR absorption spectra from a metal-oxide silicon field-effect transistor (MOSFET) as a fiinction of gate voltage (or inversion layer density, n, which is the parameter reported in the figure). Clear peaks are seen in these spectra for the 0-1, 0-2 and 0-3 inter-electric-field subband transitions that develop for charge carriers when confined to a narrow (<100 A) region near the oxide-semiconductor interface. The inset shows a schematic representation of the attenuated total reflection (ATR) arrangement used in these experiments. These data provide an example of the use of ATR IR spectroscopy for the probing of electronic states in semiconductor surfaces [44]-...

A quantum mechanical treatment of molecular systems usually starts with the Bom-Oppenlieimer approximation, i.e., the separation of the electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom. This is a very good approximation for well separated electronic states. The expectation value of the total energy in this case is a fiinction of the nuclear coordinates and the parameters in the electronic wavefunction, e.g., orbital coefficients. The wavefiinction parameters are most often detennined by tire variation theorem the electronic energy is made stationary (in the most important ground-state case it is minimized) with respect to them. The... 

V is the derivative with respect to R.) We stress that in this formalism, I and J denote the complete adiabatic electronic state, and not a component thereof. Both /) and y) contain the nuclear coordinates, designated by R, as parameters. The above line integral was used and elaborated in calculations of nuclear dynamics on potential surfaces by several authors [273,283,288-301]. (For an extended discussion of this and related matters the reviews of Sidis [48] and Pacher et al. [49] are especially infonnative.)... 

Figure 3. Low-energy vibronic spectrum in a. 11 electronic state of a linear triatomic molecule, computed for various values of the Renner parameter e and spin-orbit constant Aso (in cm ). The spectrum shown in the center of figure (e = —0.17, A o = —37cm ) corresponds to the A TT state of NCN [28,29]. The zero on the energy scale represents the minimum of the potential energy surface. Solid lines A = 0 vibronic levels dashed lines K = levels dash-dotted lines K = 1 levels dotted lines = 3 levels. Spin-vibronic levels are denoted by the value of the corresponding quantum number P P = Af - - E note that E is in this case spin quantum number),...

Figure 5, Low-eriergy vibronic spectrum in a electronic state of a linear triatomic molecule. The parameter c determines the magnitude of splitting of adiabatic bending potential curves, is the spin-orbit coupling constant, which is assumed to be positive. The zero on the...

The expressions (75) and (77) can he used to extract the parameters ki, k2, ki2, s l, s 2, and (2 from the mean adiabatic potential and the difference of the adiabatic potentials for two components of the electronic state spatially degenerate at linear molecular geomehy. 

Each of these tools has advantages and limitations. Ab initio methods involve intensive computation and therefore tend to be limited, for practical reasons of computer time, to smaller atoms, molecules, radicals, and ions. Their CPU time needs usually vary with basis set size (M) as at least M correlated methods require time proportional to at least M because they involve transformation of the atomic-orbital-based two-electron integrals to the molecular orbital basis. As computers continue to advance in power and memory size, and as theoretical methods and algorithms continue to improve, ab initio techniques will be applied to larger and more complex species. When dealing with systems in which qualitatively new electronic environments and/or new bonding types arise, or excited electronic states that are unusual, ab initio methods are essential. Semi-empirical or empirical methods would be of little use on systems whose electronic properties have not been included in the data base used to construct the parameters of such models. 

Since depends on nuclear coordinates, because of the term, so do and but, in the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation proposed in 1927, it is assumed that vibrating nuclei move so slowly compared with electrons that J/ and involve the nuclear coordinates as parameters only. The result for a diatomic molecule is that a curve (such as that in Figure 1.13, p. 24) of potential energy against intemuclear distance r (or the displacement from equilibrium) can be drawn for a particular electronic state in which and are constant. 

In using the combination difference method to obtain vibrational parameters, cOg, etc., for two electronic states between which vibronic transitions are observed, the first step is to organize all the vibronic transition wavenumbers into a Deslandres table. An example is shown in Table 7.7 for the system of carbon monoxide. The electronic... 

The above corrections assume all of the molecules are in the ground electronic state so that the molecular parameters are the same for all molecules. The correction equations can give results in error when low-lying excited electronic states are present and significantly populated. An example is NO, which has an electronic state only 121.1 cm 1 above the ground state. (See Table 10.3 for this and other examples.)... 

Ideally, it would be desirable to determine many parameters in order to characterize and mechanistically define these unusual reactions. This has been an important objective that has often been considered in the course of these studies. It would be helpful to know, as a function of such parameters of the plasma as the radio-frequency power, pressure, and rate of admission of reactants, (2) the identity and concentrations of all species, including trifluoromethyl radicals, (2) the electronic states of each species, (3) the vibrational states of each species, and (4) both the rotational states of each species and the average, translational energies of, at least, the trifluoromethyl radicals. 

Fig. 1. Schematic one-dimensional cross section through the Gibbs free energy surface G(R) of a spin-state transition system along the totally symmetric stretching coordinate. The situation for three characteristic temperatures is shown (B = barrier height, ZPE = zero-point energy, 28 = asymmetry parameter, J = electronic coupling parameter, AG° = Gh — GJ...

Many chemical problems can be discussed by way of a knowledge of the electronic state of molecules. The electronic state of a molecular system becomes known if we solve the electronic Schrodinger equation, which can be separated from the time-independent, nonrelativistic Schrodinger equation for the whole molecule by the use of the Bom-Oppenheimer approximation D. In this approximation, the electrons are considered to move in the field of momentarily fixed nuclei. The nuclear configuration provides the parameters in the Schrodinger equation. 

Assignment of such spectra and fitting of model potential parameters to the observed band frequencies yields the magnitudes of V3 and V6 in the two electronic states involved, either S, and S0, or D0 and S,. Franck-Condon modeling of relative band intensities then yields the relative phase of the potentials in the two electronic states. We typically fix the absolute phase of the potentials from ab initio electronic structure calculations on both the S0 and D0 states. This provides an overall consistency check as well. 

---