Double-substrate-limitation function

The kinetic modeling of the external transport limitation is successful with aid of a double-substrate-limitation function [61-63] ... 

The transition between the two limiting situations is a function of the parameter (k-e/kc)Cp. The ratio between the catalytic peak current, ip, and the peak current of the reversible wave obtained in the absence of substrate, Pp, is thus a function of one kinetic parameter (e.g., Xe) of the competition parameter, (k e/A c)c and of the excess ratio y = C /Cp, where and Cp are the bulk concentrations of the substrate and catalyst, respectively. In fact, as discussed in Section 2.6, the intermediate C, obtained by an acid-base reaction, is very often easier to reduce than the substrate, thus leading to the redox catalytic ECE mechanism represented by the four reactions in Scheme 2.13. Results pertaining to the EC mechanism can easily be transposed to the ECE mechanism by doubling the value of the excess factor. 

Ring-closing metathesis seems particularly well suited to be combined with Passerini and Ugi reactions, due to the low reactivity of the needed additional olefin functions, which avoid any interference with the MCR reaction. However, some limitations are present. First of all, it is not easy to embed diversity into the two olefinic components, because this leads in most cases to chiral substrates whose obtainment in enantiomerically pure form may not be trivial. Second, some unsaturated substrates, such as enamines, acrolein and p,y-unsaturated aldehydes cannot be used as component for the IMCR, whereas a,p-unsaturated amides are not ideal for RCM processes. Finally, the introduction of the double bond into the isocyanide component is possible only if 9-membered or larger rings are to be synthesized (see below). The smallest ring that has been synthesized to date is the 6-membered one represented by dihydropyridones 167, obtained starting with allylamine and bute-noic acid [133] (Fig. 33). Note that, for the reasons explained earlier, compounds... 

Sex pheromones in the Lepidoptera are multi-component mixtures consisting mostly of olefinic compounds possessing a terminal aldehyde, alcohol, or acetate moiety. Besides functional group differences, the constituents of lepidopteran sex pheromones vary in hydrocarbon chain length and in the specific number, location, and geometry of double bonds. These chemical structures are formed in biosynthetic pathways involving a limited number of enzymatic steps believed to use fatty-acyl thioesters of coenzyme A (acyl-CoA) as substrates. Key reactions are desaturation, limited [3-oxidation, and a small number of terminal functional group modifications (reviewed in Chapter 3). 

Applications of controlled radical reactions - including oxidation - deal almost exclusively with C=C double bonds. Indeed, a multitude of examples have been reported for the selective transformation of this functional group. Contrasting with this situation, only a very limited number of selective ( stereocontrolled ) radical reactions involving sp3-hybridized C-H bonds are known. Particularly useful functionalizations along these lines include the hydroxylation and the acyloxylation of alkyl chains. The reason for their limited success is of course due to the high stability of the C-H bond compared with that of the olefinic C=C unit most electrophilic reagents which readily add to unsaturated substrates are not able to oxidize a C-H bond. 

Cleavage of allylic C-O bonds (Eq. 80),135 reduction of conjugated double bonds,136 137 and reductive dehalogenations138 139 occasionally intervene when reducing functionalized sulfones with Na/Hg. These side reactions are dependent on the substrates and reaction conditions, and should not be considered as general limitations. 

---