Cyclobutane, angle strain conformation

Cyclobutane has less angle strain than cyclopropane (only 19.5°). It is also believed to have some bent-bond character associated with the carbon-carbon bonds. The molecule exists in a nonplanar conformation in order to minimize hydrogen-hydrogen eclipsing strain. 

Cyclobutane has less angle strain than cyclopropane and can reduce the torsional strain that goes with a planai geometry by adopting the nonplanai puckered conformation shown in Figure 3.11. 

Cyclobutane, in fact, is not a planar molecule. To reduce torsional strain, this compound attains the above nonplanar folded conformation. Hydrogen atoms are not eclipsed in this conformation and torsional strain is much less than in the planar structure. However, in this form angles are less than 90°, which means a slight increase in angle strain. 

In fact, in any planar conformation all the C-H bonds will be eclipsed with their neighbours. In cyclobutane, the ring distorts from a planar conformation in order to reduce the eclipsing interactions, even though this reduces the bond angles further and so increases the bond angle strain. 

Evidence of maoy kinds strongly indicates that cyclobutane is not planar, but rapidly changes between equivalent, slightly folded conformations (Fig. 9.7). Here, too, torsional strain is partially relieved at the cost of a little angle strain. 

The experimental data in Table 3.1 show that the calculated values of total angle strain are approximately correct only for cyclopropane, cyclobutane, and cyclopentane. Cyclohexane is definitely not the strained compound Baeyer s theory predicts, and the larger ring compounds are also not very strained. Any chemist today can explain the discrepancy between these calculated and experimental values of strain energy cyclohexane is not planar. In either the chair or boat conformations (Figure 3.12), all bond angles can be approximately 109.5°. In the chair conformation of cyclohexane, all bonds are staggered, and there are no apparent van der Waals repulsions in the molecule. ... 

Cyclobutane has less angle strain than cyclopropane. However, it has more torsional strain, because there are four sets of eclipsing H s rather than just three. To alleviate some of this additional torsional strain, cyclobutane can adopt a sfightly puckered conformation without gaining too much angle strain ... 

Cyclopentane has much less angle strain than cyclobutane or cyclopropane. It can also reduce much of its torsional strain by adopting the following conformation ... 

---