Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Average limiting current

Influence of mercury column height. In the above Ilkovic equations for the average limiting current m and [Pg.134]

The primary current distribution is uniform on the hemisphere. Numerical calculations using the potential theory have shown that the current distribution is essentially uniform on the RHSE if the current density is less than 68% of the average limiting current density [47]. [Pg.172]

The average Sherwood number, Shiv, and average limiting current density, iljmjav, can be obtained by integrating Eqs. (40)-(41) over the electrode surface. The results for a hemisphere, whose entire surface is subject to mass transfer are ... [Pg.182]

Example ESI selectively ionizes the basic compounds, i.e., only a small fraction of the entire chemical composition, in a sample of South American cmde oil. Nevertheless, the positive-ion ESI-FT-ICR mass spectrum exhibits more than 11,100 resolved peaks, of which >75 % may be assigned to a unique elemental composition (CcHhOoNnSJ. Such a separation in mass is possible because the average mass resolution in the m/z 225-1000 broadband spectrum is approximately 350,000 (Fig. 12.12). This demonstrates the current upper limit for the number of chemically distinct components resolved and identified in a single step. [86]... [Pg.491]

An over-all comparison reveals the consistency of the general results, thus bringing out the limitations of the separating power of such a method. It does not discriminate for kt values differing by a factor of only 2 but often shows the difference when the factor is about 5. The separating power of the kinetic method is of the same order as the current average difference shown by direct measurements, meaning that this method remains of definite interest. [Pg.80]

An example of a nonoccupational exposure is methanol, which is formed endogenously, probably as the result of the activities of intestinal flora or enzymatic processes. It is present in a number of consumer products. Methanol may be present in low concentrations in some foods, juices, and alcoholic beverages. Methanol can also be derived from the intestinal enzymatic hydrolysis of the artificial sweetener aspartame, which results in methanol absorption from the intestine (Butchko et al. 2002). It is estimated that a 355-mL serving of aspartame-sweetened beverages and of various fruit and tomato juices may contribute about 20-100 mg of dietary methanol (Butchko et al. 2002). For comparison purposes, exposure at the current Threshold Limit Value time-weighted average of methanol (262 mg/m3) would result in a daily dose of about 1,500 mg, assuming an 8-hour inhaled volume of 10 m3 of air and absorption of 57%. [Pg.114]

New proposed Tier 2 emission standards proposed for introduction in the 2004 model year would apply to sport utility vehicles, minivans, and pickup trucks and make them meet the same standards as passenger cars. It has also been proposed to lower the sulfur level in gasoline to 30 PPM from the current average level of 300 PPM by 2004. The Euro IV limits proposed for 2005 are satisfied by technology from at least one catalyst supplier... [Pg.95]

Blending Limit of Petroleum Coke, The blending limit of petroleum coke is considered to be about 5% as already mentioned above. This can be explained from the current average value of MF of about 200 to 500 DDPM for coal blends in the Japanese coking industry. Figure 13 shows limit quantities of added petroleum coke for various values of fluidity for the base coals. In the determination of these limit quantities, the quantity of added petroleum coke with which the fluidity of the coal blend decreased to below 200 DDPM under the effect of this blending was deemed as the limit. [Pg.275]

Fig. 24. Comparison of fluorine abundances observed by [130] and model predictions for the 3Mq, 7 = 0.008 model. The predictions are normalized such that the initial 19F abundance corresponds to the average F abundance observed in K and M stars. Each symbol on the prediction lines represents a TDU episode. Solid lines represent calculations performed using no 18F(q, p)21 Ne reaction, which are equivalent to using the current lower limit, recommended value and Brussels library rate. Dotted lines are calculations performed using the current upper limit of the rate. Figure provided by Maria Lugaro... Fig. 24. Comparison of fluorine abundances observed by [130] and model predictions for the 3Mq, 7 = 0.008 model. The predictions are normalized such that the initial 19F abundance corresponds to the average F abundance observed in K and M stars. Each symbol on the prediction lines represents a TDU episode. Solid lines represent calculations performed using no 18F(q, p)21 Ne reaction, which are equivalent to using the current lower limit, recommended value and Brussels library rate. Dotted lines are calculations performed using the current upper limit of the rate. Figure provided by Maria Lugaro...
Table 2. Model predictions of average limiting current density across wafer surface. Table 2. Model predictions of average limiting current density across wafer surface.
Since the older work was often based on average limiting currents, many reported diffusion current constants are defined from the version of the Ilkovic equation for average currents, which gives ... [Pg.268]


See other pages where Average limiting current is mentioned: [Pg.134]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.473]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.1493]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.842]    [Pg.518]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.98 ]




SEARCH



Average limiting current density

Average limits

Current limit

Current, average

Limitation current

Limited currents

Limiting currents

© 2024 chempedia.info