Corrosion Tafel reaction

HER measurements showed the onset overpotential for acidic hydrogen evolution was found to be small (0.078 V) and material was also found to be resistant to corrosion in the acidic media. These two results suggest that both the synergistic effects ofthe alloys and the nitride component make this type of material a promising candidate for the HER reaction. The resulting Tafel slope was found to be 35 mV decade". This suggests the Tafel reaction recombination step to be the rate-limiting step in the HER. 

The two dashed lines in the upper left hand corner of the Evans diagram represent the electrochemical potential vs electrochemical reaction rate (expressed as current density) for the oxidation and the reduction form of the hydrogen reaction. At point A the two are equal, ie, at equiUbrium, and the potential is therefore the equiUbrium potential, for the specific conditions involved. Note that the reaction kinetics are linear on these axes. The change in potential for each decade of log current density is referred to as the Tafel slope (12). Electrochemical reactions often exhibit this behavior and a common Tafel slope for the analysis of corrosion problems is 100 millivolts per decade of log current (1). A more detailed treatment of Tafel slopes can be found elsewhere (4,13,14). 

The sohd line in Figure 3 represents the potential vs the measured (or the appHed) current density. Measured or appHed current is the current actually measured in an external circuit ie, the amount of external current that must be appHed to the electrode in order to move the potential to each desired point. The corrosion potential and corrosion current density can also be deterrnined from the potential vs measured current behavior, which is referred to as polarization curve rather than an Evans diagram, by extrapolation of either or both the anodic or cathodic portion of the curve. This latter procedure does not require specific knowledge of the equiHbrium potentials, exchange current densities, and Tafel slope values of the specific reactions involved. Thus Evans diagrams, constmcted from information contained in the Hterature, and polarization curves, generated by experimentation, can be used to predict and analyze uniform and other forms of corrosion. Further treatment of these subjects can be found elsewhere (1—3,6,18). 

The effects of adsorbed inhibitors on the individual electrode reactions of corrosion may be determined from the effects on the anodic and cathodic polarisation curves of the corroding metaP . A displacement of the polarisation curve without a change in the Tafel slope in the presence of the inhibitor indicates that the adsorbed inhibitor acts by blocking active sites so that reaction cannot occur, rather than by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. An increase in the Tafel slope of the polarisation curve due to the inhibitor indicates that the inhibitor acts by affecting the mechanism of the reaction. However, the determination of the Tafel slope will often require the metal to be polarised under conditions of current density and potential which are far removed from those of normal corrosion. This may result in differences in the adsorption and mechanistic effects of inhibitors at polarised metals compared to naturally corroding metals . Thus the interpretation of the effects of inhibitors at the corrosion potential from applied current-potential polarisation curves, as usually measured, may not be conclusive. This difficulty can be overcome in part by the use of rapid polarisation methods . A better procedure is the determination of true polarisation curves near the corrosion potential by simultaneous measurements of applied current, corrosion rate (equivalent to the true anodic current) and potential. However, this method is rather laborious and has been little used. 

Blocking of reaction sites The interaction of adsorbed inhibitors with surface metal atoms may prevent these metal atoms from participating in either the anodic or cathodic reactions of corrosion. This simple blocking effect decreases the number of surface metal atoms at which these reactions can occur, and hence the rates of these reactions, in proportion to the extent of adsorption. The mechanisms of the reactions are not affected and the Tafel slopes of the polarisation curves remain unchanged. Behaviour of this type has been observed for iron in sulphuric acid solutions containing 2,6-dimethyl quinoline, /3-naphthoquinoline , or aliphatic sulphides . 

Participation in the electrode reactions The electrode reactions of corrosion involve the formation of adsorbed intermediate species with surface metal atoms, e.g. adsorbed hydrogen atoms in the hydrogen evolution reaction adsorbed (FeOH) in the anodic dissolution of iron . The presence of adsorbed inhibitors will interfere with the formation of these adsorbed intermediates, but the electrode processes may then proceed by alternative paths through intermediates containing the inhibitor. In these processes the inhibitor species act in a catalytic manner and remain unchanged. Such participation by the inhibitor is generally characterised by a change in the Tafel slope observed for the process. Studies of the anodic dissolution of iron in the presence of some inhibitors, e.g. halide ions , aniline and its derivatives , the benzoate ion and the furoate ion , have indicated that the adsorbed inhibitor I participates in the reaction, probably in the form of a complex of the type (Fe-/), or (Fe-OH-/), . The dissolution reaction proceeds less readily via the adsorbed inhibitor complexes than via (Fe-OH),js, and so anodic dissolution is inhibited and an increase in Tafel slope is observed for the reaction. 

Adsorbed species may also accelerate the rate of anodic dissolution of metals, as indicated by a decrease in Tafel slope for the reaction. Thus the presence of hydrogen sulphide in acid solutions stimulates the corrosion of iron, and decreases the Tafel slope The reaction path through... 

The corrosion current (it is also assumed that the area of the metal is 1 cm so that - ho ) occurs at a value within the Tafel region for the anodic and cathodic reaction, i.e. transport overpotential is negligible. 

Tafel Extrapolation Corrosion is an electrochemical reaction of a metal and its environment. When corrosion occurs, the current that flows between individual small anodes and cathodes on the metal surface causes the electrode potential for the system to change. While... 

The primary use of this laboratoiy technique today is as a quick check to determine the order of magnitude of a corrosion reaction. Sometimes the calculated rate from an immersion test does not Took correct when compared to the visual appearance of the metal coupon. While the specific corrosion rate number determined by Tafel extrapolation is seldom accurate, the method remains a good confirmation tool. 

When the cathodic reaction is the reduction of oi n molecules for which the equilibrium potential is relatively high (much more anodic than the corrosion potential), the corrosion current is frequently controlled by the diffusion of hydrated o Q en molecules towards the corroding metal electrode thus, the corrosion ciurent equals the diffusion current of o en molecules as shown in Fig. 11-8. For this mode of diffusion-controlled corrosion of metals the cathodic Tafel constant is... 

There is a special importance in the mechanism of 02 reduction on iron because of its relevance as the counter-cathodic reaction in corrosion mechanisms that involve Fe more often than other metals. Many of the practical costs of Fe corrosion occur in neutral solution, so that the pH range in the study described here (Jovancicevic, 1986) is between 6 and 9. The experimental methods involved the use of ring-disk analysis (see Section 7A. 14) to detect H202, an obvious possible intermediate in the measurement of the log /—potential relation (Fig. 7.101) to give Tafel constants and the reaction order with respect to 02 and pH. 

However, it should not be surprising if the anodic and the cathodic Tafel plots do not intersect at E = Ecorr as the two reactions participating in the corrosion process are actually studied at potentials far removed from the corrosion potential. Moreover, it is not quite realistic to rely on the very simple model described here. Therefore, it appears more useful to record a complete current-potential characteristic and to attempt its interpretation in terms of simultaneous processes that can possibly be expected. Several practical examples have been extensively reviewed [93]. 

Other results point to no electrocatalytic increment with amorphous metals. Heusler and Huerta [591] have investigated amorphous Co75B25 and Ni67B33 with respect to corrosion. For the reaction of hydrogen evolution, in the case of the Co alloy, Tafel slopes of 120 mV, along with lower exchange currents for the amorphous material have been reported. Thus, the mechanism is the same as for the crystalline metal. In the case of the Ni alloy, some decrease in the Tafel slope has been observed with heat treatment (which promotes crystallization). Similarly, the same Tafel slope of 120 mV and the same exchange current as for pure Fe have been measured with... 

From Eqs. (1222) and (12.23), it is clear that the corrosion current depends upon the exchange currents (i.e., available areas and exchange-current densities), Tafel slopes, and equilibrium potentials for both the metal-dissolution and electronation reactions. To obtain an explicit expression for the corrosion current [cf. Eq. (12.22)], one has first to solve Eqs. (12.22) and (12.23) for A0corr. If, however, simplifying assumptions are not made, the algebra becomes unwieldy and leads to highly cumbersome equations. 

Fig. 12.21. The cathodic and anodic Tafel lines at two different electrode reactions. At l/corr there is a steady state. No net current passes, but there is a steady production of A (e.g., H2) and B+ (the metal, corroding) in a net electrochemical reaction that appears to be chemical (no net current flows to an outside circuit). Note the difference in these diagrams from the Evans-Hoar diagrams, which show corrosion is spontaneous and drives itself. The difference is similar to that between an electrochemical reaction and a fuel cell. (Reprinted from J. O M. Bockris and S. N. M. Kahn, Surface Electro Chemistry, Fig. 8.1, p. 747 Plenum, 1993).

Estimate the corrosion potential corr and the corrosion current density icorr of Zn in a deaerated HC1 solution of pH 1 at 298 K. In this solution Zn corrosion is accompanied by the hydrogen evolution reaction (h.c.r.). The parameters (standard electrode potential E°, exchange current density i0, Tafel slope b of Zn dissolution and the h.e.r. on Zn are... 

Consider an Evans diagram in a general way. The anodic dissolution reaction is to be represented in the Tafel region the same applies for the cathodic partner reaction, (a) Draw the two Tafel lines and show the region of intersection Oanodic= Cathodic)- Indicate on the graph the corrosion rate and corrosion potential. 

The Tafel plot permits the calculation of the rate constants of the reactions from the intersections, and the charge transfer coefficient from the slope. Corrosion researchers use the parameter b (the inverse of the slope of the Tafel plot) extensively in their studies, the reason being the representation of the Tafel plot in the way illustrated in Fig. 16.4. In fact,... 

There are several factors that can lead to non-Tafel behavior. Diffusion limitations on a reaction have already been introduced and can be seen in the cathodic portion of Fig. 27. Ohmic losses in solution can lead to a curvature of the Tafel region, leading to erroneously high estimations of corrosion rate if not compensated for properly. The effects of the presence of a buffer in solution can also lead to odd-looking polarization behavior that does not lend itself to direct Tafel extrapolation. 

In the presence of oxidizing species (such as dissolved oxygen), some metals and alloys spontaneously passivate and thus exhibit no active region in the polarization curve, as shown in Fig. 6. The oxidizer adds an additional cathodic reaction to the Evans diagram and causes the intersection of the total anodic and total cathodic lines to occur in the passive region (i.e., Ecmi is above Ew). The polarization curve shows none of the characteristics of an active-passive transition. The open circuit dissolution rate under these conditions is the passive current density, which is often on the order of 0.1 j.A/cm2 or less. The increased costs involved in using CRAs can be justified by their low dissolution rate under such oxidizing conditions. A comparison of dissolution rates for a material with the same anodic Tafel slope, E0, and i0 demonstrates a reduction in corrosion rate... 

A second related issue is the asymmetry in the E-i response near Ecelectron transfer reaction that is different from the metal oxidation reaction. Therefore there is no fundamental reason why pa and pc should be equal, and they should be expected to differ. The extent of their difference defines the degree of asymmetry. Asymmetry matters because the extent of the region where Eq. (2) is a good approximation of Eq. (1) then differs for anodic and cathodic polarization (29). The errors in assuming 10 mV linearity using both the tangent to the E-i data at Econ and for +10 or -10 mV potentiostatic polarizations have been defined for different Tafel slopes (30). 

The Tafel expressions for both the anodic and the cathodic reaction can be directly incorporated into a mixed potential model. In modeling terms, a Tafel relationship can be defined in terms of the Tafel slope (b), the equilibrium potential for the specific half-reaction ( e), and the exchange current density (70), where the latter can be easily expressed as a rate constant, k. An attempt to illustrate this is shown in Fig. 10 using the corrosion of Cu in neutral aerated chloride solutions as an example. The equilibrium potential is calculated from the Nernst equation e.g., for the 02 reduction reaction,... 

---