Coordination complexes, bonding ligand field

There have been several reviews of mechanisms of photosubstitution in rhodium(III) complexes. Bond indexes for ground and excited states have been discussed in relation to D2h species. " The observation of stereospecificity has been discussed in relation to lifetimes for triplet singlet deactivation and geometric rearrangements. Direct evidence has been presented to support the intermediacy of, and role of rearrangement in, five-coordinate intermediates in ligand field irradiation experiments. Rhodium(III) has been discussed in relation to cobalt(III) and iridium(III), and to ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) as well. ... 

First, consider an octahedral nickel(ii) complex. The strong-field ground configuration is 2g g- The repulsive interaction between the filled 2g subshell and the six octahedrally disposed bonds is cubically isotropic. That is to say, interactions between the t2g electrons and the bonding electrons are the same with respect to x, y and z directions. The same is true of the interactions between the six ligands and the exactly half-full gg subset. So, while the d electrons in octahedrally coordinated nickel(ii) complexes will repel all bonding electrons, no differentiation between bonds is to be expected. Octahedral d coordination, per se, is stable in this regard. 

The synthesis of stable complexes with transition metal-phosphorus triple bonds is of fundamental importance and opens a novel chapter of a special field of coordination chemistry. The synthesis of analogous complexes with ligands of the heavier homologues like arsenic has partially been carried out [6], while for antimony and bismuth, the elusive M=Sb and M=Bi systems have now moved within reach. Moreover, the experimental and theoretical... 

Although the properties which can be computed are limited, LFT has provided for over half a century a reasonably useful, semi-quantitative picture of metal-ligand bonding in Werner-type coordination complexes (3,25-27). In the present context, the advantage of LFT is its computational efficiency. Therefore, we added LFT to MM to give the ligand field molecular mechanics (LFMM) method (28). 

Few X-ray structures have been reported for the square-planar Ni(I) macrocyclic complexes (57,66,134,137), and only one has been reported thus far for the five-coordinate Ni(I) macrocyclic complexes (136). In general, Ni—N bond distances in Ni(I) complexes are anticipated to be much longer than in Ni(II) complexes, since the Ni(I) ion should be larger than the Ni(II) ion in the square-planar geometry, and UV-vis spectra indicate that ligand field strengths of Ni(I) complexes must be significantly weaker than those of Ni(II) complexes. However, X-ray structures of Ni(I) macrocyclic complexes are often inconsistent with such expectations. 

---