Coordinate bond-bonding models crystal field theory

The model that largely replaced valence bond theory for interpreting the chemistry of coordination compounds was Ihe crystal field theory, first proposed in 1929 by Hans Bethe.11 As originally conceived, it was a model based on a purely electrostatic... 

Scientists have long recognized that many of the magnetic properties and colors of transition-metal complexes are related to the presence of d electrons in the metal cation. In this section we consider a model for bonding in transition-metal complexes, crystal-field theory, that accounts for many of the observed properties of these substances. Because the predictions of crystal-field theory are essentially the same as those obtained with more advanced molecular-orbital theories, crystal-field theory is an excellent place to start in considering the electronic structure of coordination compounds. 

Crystal field theory is a simple electrostatic model that treats the transition metal ion and the ligands as point charges. It is very successful in predicting in a very simple way the role of the 3d electrons in determining the properties of complex ions. Crystal field theory ignores the fact that the ligands form coordinate bonds with the transition metal ion via their lone pairs. 

We have seen that the crystal-field model provides a basis for explaining many features of transition-metal complexes. In fact, it can be used to explain many observations in addition to those we have discussed. Many lines of evidence show, however, that the bonding between transition-metal ions and ligands must have some covalent character. Molecular-orbital theory (Sections 9.7 and 9.8) can also be used to describe the bonding in complexes, although the application of molecular-orbital theory to coordination compounds is beyond the scope of our discussion. The crystal-field model, although not entirely accurate in all details, provides an adequate and useful first description of the electronic structure of complexes. 

---