Coherent states subsystem dynamics

Figure 6.10 Ultrafast efficient switching in the five-state system via SPODS based on multipulse sequences from sinusoidal phase modulation (PL). The shaped laser pulse shown in (a) results from complete forward design of the control field. Frame (b) shows die induced bare state population dynamics. After preparation of the resonant subsystem in a state of maximum electronic coherence by the pre-pulse, the optical phase jump of = —7r/2 shifts die main pulse in-phase with the induced charge oscillation. Therefore, the interaction energy is minimized, resulting in the selective population of the lower dressed state /), as seen in the dressed state population dynamics in (d) around t = —50 fs. Due to the efficient energy splitting of the dressed states, induced in the resonant subsystem by the main pulse, the lower dressed state is shifted into resonance widi die lower target state 3) (see frame (c) around t = 0). As a result, 100% of the population is transferred nonadiabatically to this particular target state, which is selectively populated by the end of the pulse.

A quantum computational network can be decomposed into quantum logic gates [94, 95], analogously to the situation for classical computers. Quantum logic gates provide fundamental examples of conditional quantum dynamics, in which one subsystem undergoes a coherent evolution, which depends on the quantum state of another subsystem. 

Decoherence is an essential concept appearing in a system in which a quantum subsystem contacts classical subsystem(s) in one way or another. As is widely recognized, the SET cannot describe this dynamics since there is no mechanism in it to switch off the electronic coherence along the nuclear path. The decoherence problem is critically important not only in our nonadiabatic dynamics but in other contemporary science such as spin-Boson dynamics in quantum computation theory and more extensively a quantum theory in open (dissipative) systems [147]. The decoherence problem is also critical to chaos induced by nonadiabatic djmamics [136, 137,182, 453, 454]. Therefore, in the rest of this section, we pay deeper attention to the aspect of the effect of electronic state decoherence strongly coupled with the relevant nuclear motion. A review about the notion of decoherence related to quantum mechanical measmement theory is found in the papers by Rossky et al. [53]. 

---