Clearing ground

When clearing ground, be realistic. Do not clear more than you are able to keep weed-free. 

If your topsoil is deep, remove it and replace it with poorer soil. Firm the soil down and rake it level do not add any compost or fertilizer. Leave the area for a few weeks after preparation, then hoe off any germinating weeds so that you have completely clear ground to sow into (see facing page). 

The interpretation of kinetic data begins with a hypothetical sequence of ele mentary reaction steps, each characterized by two microscopic rate constants, one for the forward and one for the reverse reaction. From this proposed mechanism a rate equation is derived, predicting the dependence of the observed reaction rate on concentrations and on microscopic rate constants, and its form is tested against the observations. If the form of the rate equation meets the test of experiment, it may be possible to derive from the data numerical values for the microscopic rate constants of the proposed elementary reaction steps. While inconsistency is clear grounds for modifying or rejecting a mechanistic hypothesis, agreement does not prove the proposed mechanism correct. 

A Before or on day of harvesting, clear ground around the herb of surrounding weeds. 

Clear grounds for rejection are points 2 and 5 point 3 can be grounds either for rejection or for revision. Defects in point 1 can usually be eliminated by careful revision. Points 4 and 6 are too subjective to make hard-and-fast rules about rejection. 

One lesson learned has been that developing a robust compliance verification program is difficult. Along the way they learned that (1) clear ground rules for audits must be established, communicated, and adhered to (2) it is not possible to audit in requirements and (3) the compliance verification organization must be equal with the program managers and the technical authority. In addition, they determined that not just anyone can do SUBSAFE work. The number of activities authorized to perform SUBSAFE activities is strictly controlled. 

It is assumed that the reference impact produces, on clear ground, a conieal crater having an angle of 90° and a depth of 4 m. Moreover, it is assumed that the cause of the impact is undefined, possibly to be identified with a plane crash, a launched projectile or a blast from an internal or external explosive charge. 

We can deduce from this table that most of the signatures have combinations of Dn values that allow us to distinguish one from another, depending on the actual standard deviations (not shown). Two classes, urban 1 and cleared (ground), are quite similar in the first four bands but apparently are different enough in bands 5 and 7 to suppose that they are separable. The range of variations in the thermal band 6 is much smaller than in other bands, suggesting its limitation as an efficient separator. 

Most of what is discussed in this paper is applicable to saturated (or dry) soils but in many eases soils in practice are unsaturated. There is eurrently no simple and realistic theory for strength and stiffness of unsaturated soil similar to the effeetive stress theory for saturated soil. Clearly ground professionals should know that soils may be unsaturated but, in the absence of a simple theory, detailed analyses for unsaturated soils may be beyond the eore skills of most geotechnieal engineers and engineering geologists. 

---