Cholesky’s decomposition

Cholesky s decomposition [56a,b] has been used to obtain S in a practical manner. The reason to choose Cholesky s algorithm is found essentially in the numerical stability of this procedure, but alternatively in the possible definition of a recursive pathway to evaluate S [56c], starting from a small number of functions up to any... 

Procedure 2 Inverse of a Definite Positive Matrix using Cholesky s Decomposition. 

Although this final determinant structure can easily lead to an immediate construction of sequential or parallel Fortran subroutines, there cannot be a claim such that this procedure will be better, from a computational point of view, than well established numerical ones, based on other grounds as Cholesky decomposition, see references [8] for more details. One can recall again the remarks already made at the beginning of section 3.1 above, and stress once more the formal nature of the programming immediate translationcapabilitiesofNSS s. 

X. The needed elements of the matrix X are obtained directly from the Cholesky decomposition of X. The constrained minimization of S 9) is performed by successive quadratic programming, as in Chapter 6, but with these multiresponse identities. 

This matched curvature multivariate normal candidate density does not really have any relationship with the spread of the target. If we used it is likely that it does not dominate the target in the tails. So, instead, we use the multivariate Student s r[m, V] with low degrees of freedom. First we find the lower triangular matrix L that satisfies V = LL by using the Cholesky decomposition. Then we draw a random sample of Student s t random variables with k degrees of freedom. 

Once the Hes.sian has been updated, a Newton. step given by equation (2) is taken on the model quadratic. surface. For this step to be in the downhill direction, the He.ssian mu.st be positive definite, i.e., all of the eigenvalue.s mu.st be positive. Positive definite character can be tested and enforced by using a modified Cholesky decomposition to calculate the inverse, or by diagonalizing the Hessian and adjusting the offending eigenvalues. 

This so-called Cholesky decomposition contains the symmetric orthogonalization as a special case, when V equals U. Unfortunately. there is no simple way to obtain information on the constraint for the charges in a semiempirical method, because the nonorthogonal basis is actually avoided and enters only through the cut-off expansion of S (2 T, is again limits our possibility for a clear-cut back transformation. It should be of the following form ... 

---