Cartesian Gaussian-Type Function

SO that SGTF can be written as a linear combination of Cartesian Gaussian-type functions (CGTF)... 

Gaussian-type functions are the most widely used basis functions in molecular electronic structure calculations. Two forms of Gaussian-type functions are in common usage. Cartesian Gaussian-type functions have the form... 

Use of these Cartesian Gaussian-type functions leads, for example, to six components of d symmetry instead of the true five components. This can be shown to be equivalent to the addition of a 3s function to the basis set and can lead to numerical problems associated with near-linear dependence if the s basis set is sufficiently large. The use of spherical Gaussian-type functions, which are often defined as... 

Basis sets for use in practical Hartree-Fock, density functional, Moller-Plesset and configuration interaction calculations make use of Gaussian-type functions. Gaussian functions are closely related to exponential functions, which are of the form of exact solutions to the one-electron hydrogen atom, and comprise a polynomial in the Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) followed by an exponential in r. Several series of Gaussian basis sets now have received widespread use and are thoroughly documented. A summary of all electron basis sets available in Spartan is provided in Table 3-1. Except for STO-3G and 3 -21G, any of these basis sets can be supplemented with additional polarization functions and/or with diffuse functions. It should be noted that minimal (STO-3G) and split-valence (3-2IG) basis sets, which lack polarization functions, are unsuitable for use with correlated models, in particular density functional, configuration interaction and Moller-Plesset models. Discussion is provided in Section II. 

It is customary to call the functions (2,6) Gaussian-type functions (GIF), In the form (2.6) the angular dependence is expressed by powers of X, y, z coordinates and the functions are accordingly referred to as Cartesian GTF s, Another currently used expression is given by... 

The nonorthogonal basis functions Xx( )are referred to as atomic orbitals (AOs) and are often taken to be Cartesian Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs) of the (unnormalized) form ... 

To speed up molecular integral evaluation. Boys proposed in 1950 the use of Gaussian-type functions (GTFs) instead of STOs for the atomic orbitals in an LCAO wave function. A Cartesian Gaussian centered on atom b is defined as... 

The use of Cartesian Gaussian-type orbitals (GTOs) in ab initio work may come as a surprise to anyone who recalls the functional form of the hydrogen atom orbitals, hydrogen exp( - Ir). Cartesian GTO s have the form ... 

A primitive Gaussian-type function can be written in a local Cartesian coordinate system in the form... 

Sometimes it turns out that we need to include a number of polarization functions, not just one of each type. The notation 4-31G(3d, 2p) indicates a standard 4-31G basis set augmented with three d-type primitive Cartesian Gaussians per centre and two p-type primitives on every hydrogen atom. Again, details of the... 

Details of the extended triple zeta basis set used can be found in previous papers [7,8]. It contains 86 cartesian Gaussian functions with several d- and f-type polarisation functions and s,p diffuse functions. All cartesian components of the d- and f-type polarization functions were used. Cl wave functions were obtained with the MELDF suite of programs [9]. Second order perturbation theory was employed to select the most energetically double excitations, since these are typically too numerous to otherwise handle. All single excitations, which are known to be important for describing certain one-electron properties, were automatically included. Excitations were permitted among all electrons and the full range of virtuals. 

The Hy-CI function used for molecular systems is based on the MO theory, in which molecular orbitals are many-center linear combinations of one-center Cartesian Gaussians. These combinations are the solutions of Hartree-Fock equations. An alternative way is to employ directly in Cl and Hylleraas-CI expansions simple one-center basis functions instead of producing first the molecular orbitals. This is a subject of the valence bond theory (VB). This type of approach, called Hy-CIVB, has been proposed by Cencek et al. (Cencek et.al. 1991). In the full-CI or full-Hy-CI limit (all possible CSF-s generated from the given one-center basis set), MO and VB wave functions become identical each term in a MO-expansion is simply a linear combination of all terms from a VB-expansion. Due to the non-orthogonality of one-center functions the mathematical formalism of the VB theory for many-electron systems is rather cumbersome. However, for two-electron systems this drawback is not important and, moreover, the VB function seems in this case more natural. 

The problem of evaluating matrix elements of the interelectron repulsion part of the potential between many-electron molecular Sturmian basis functions has the degree of difficulty which is familiar in quantum chemistry. It is not more difficult than usual, but neither is it less difficult. Both in the present method and in the usual SCF-CI approach, the calculations refer to exponential-type orbitals, but for the purpose of calculating many-center Coulomb and exchange integrals, it is convenient to expand the ETO s in terms of a Cartesian Gaussian basis set. Work to implement this procedure is in progress in our laboratory. 

Boys (1950) proposed an alternative to the use of STOs. All that is required for there to be an analytical solution of the general four-index integral formed from such functions is that the radial decay of the STOs be changed from e to e. That is, the AO-like functions are chosen to have the form of a Gaussian function. The general functional form of a normalized Gaussian-type orbital (GTO) in atom-centered Cartesian coordinates is... 

We use an alternative to this method, that enables a fast and accurate evaluation of the two-center integrals. Analytical integration is possible when linear combinations of Gaussian Type Orbitals are used to describe the atomic states [1,9, 10]. Imperfect behavior of such gaussian functions at large distances does not affect the results, since the two-center matrix-elements (7) have an exponential decay for increasing intemuclear distances. For example, for integrals and expressed in cartesian coordinates, one has to evaluate expressions such as... 

---