Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Caillaud-Padmanabhan method

One of the most successful methods is the Michelsen method, obtained as a small variant on the Caillaud-Padmanabhan method (Chan et al., 1978) ... [Pg.83]

Michelsen s third order semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method is a modified version of the method originally proposed by Caillaud and Padmanabhan (1971). This third-order semi-implicit method is an improvement over the original version of semi-implicit methods proposed in 1963 by Rosenbrock. [Pg.258]

Caillaud, J.B., and L. Padmanabhan, An Improved Semi-Implicit Runge-Kutta Method for Stiff Systems, Chem. Eng. J. 2, 22 -2i2 (1971). [Pg.260]

The last part of the process is now to solve (integrate) the equation system 5.129. We could use the simple Runge-Kutta method, probably going to a fourth-order scheme since we (hopefully) are not limited here by the second-order discretisation error inherent in system 5.13. it is more common to employ a more sophisticated technique. Whiting and Carr (1977) suggest Hamming s modified predictor-corrector method, Villadsen and Michelsen (1978) that of Caillaud and Padmanabhan (1971) (and provide the actual subroutines). There are other methods. The criterion will always... [Pg.106]

Caillaud JB, Padmanabhan L (1971) An improved semi-implicit Runge-Kutta method for stiff systems. Chem Eng J 2 227. [Pg.216]


See other pages where Caillaud-Padmanabhan method is mentioned: [Pg.179]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.213]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.65 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info