Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bruggeman exponent

Patel et al. showed that a Bruggeman exponent of 1.5 is often not valid for real separator materials, which do not have uniform spherical shape.Porous networks based on other morphologies such as oblate (disk-type) ellipsoids or lameller increase the tortuous path for ionic conductivity and result either in a significant increase of the exponent a, or in a complete deviation from the power law. They showed that spherical or slightly prolate ellipsoidal pores should be preferred for separators, as they lead to higher ionic conductivity separators. [Pg.219]

Equation (2b) is a scaling law depicting the conductive behavior in the vicinity of the percolation threshold, the value of the critical exponent y being 1.6 to within 0.2. Equation (2c) expresses the composite conductivity dependence upon conductor concentration beyond the percolation threshold. Equation (2c) is a simplified form, valid in the case of conductor-insulator mixtures, of a more general equation derived in different ways by Bruggeman (70), Bottcher (71) and Landauer (72) and known as the Effective Medium Theory, (E.M.T.), formula ... [Pg.222]

Bruggeman equation for different exponents L. The curve for Z,=0.33 is the same as for the CRIM equation (see Section 8.7.4.3). (Turves are compared with experimental data for water-saturated sandstone. Pooley et al. (1978). [Pg.355]


See other pages where Bruggeman exponent is mentioned: [Pg.219]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.854]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.854]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.463]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.185 ]




SEARCH



Exponents

© 2024 chempedia.info