Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bonding orbital participation

It may be proper at this stage to lead the reader back to the stage where we constructed the localized orbitals of a CH2 group. At that time two valence orbitals were set aside—the 2pv orbital, and the outer (2s, 2pr) hybrid. Both of these orbitals lie in the. r, y plane. Now in our description of cyclopropane, we used bond orbitals to describe the CC bonding these bond orbitals are derived from in-plane (xy y) hybrids on each carbon. The two hybrids which are required on each carbon atom—in ordet to participate in two bond orbitals—are built precisely from the 2py orbital and the (2s, 2pj.) out combination on each CH2 group. [Pg.22]

FIGURE 22. Partial CS d) Wiberg indexes characterizing d-orbital participation plotted against the experimentally determined S—C bond lengths in some sulfonyl derivatives70. ... [Pg.52]

Both NH, and NH24 are angular species, but the bond angle in NH2" is less than that in NH2+. (a) What is the reason for this difference in bond angles (b) Take the x-axis as lying perpendicular to the plane of the molecule. Does the N2px orbital participate in the hybridization for either species Briefly explain your answer. [Pg.254]

Among the compounds that form complexes with silver and other metals are benzene (represented as in 9) and cyclooctatetraene. When the metal involved has a coordination number >1, more than one donor molecule participates. In many cases, this extra electron density comes from CO groups, which in these eomplexes are called carbonyl groups. Thus, benzene-chromium tricarbonyl (10) is a stable compound. Three arrows are shown, since all three aromatic bonding orbitals contribute some electron density to the metal. Metallocenes (p. 53) may be considered a special case of this type of complex, although the bonding in metallocenes is much stronger. [Pg.103]

The above relationships between the thiiranes (20) and their dioxides (17) are reminiscent of those between cyclopropane and cyclopropanone. The entire phenomena of the C—C bond lengthening and the concomitant C—S bond shortening in the three-membered ring sulfones and sulfoxides can be accounted for in terms of the sulfur 3d-orbital participation and the variation in the donor-acceptor capacities of the S, SO and S02 . The variations of the calculated valence-state orbital energies, together with the corresponding variations of the C—C overlap populations, can be used to understand the discontinuous variations of the C—C and the C—S bond lengths in the series thiiranes -... [Pg.387]

It is noteworthy that Rydberg orbital occupancies on the central atom (rY, final column of Table 3.29) are relatively negligible (0.01-0.03e), showing that d-orbital participation or other expansion of the valence shell is a relatively insignificant feature of hyperbonded species. However, the case of HLiH- is somewhat paradoxical in this respect. The cationic central Li is found to use conventional sp linear hybrids to form the hydride bonds, and thus seems to represent a genuine case of expansion of the valence shell (i.e., to the 2p subshell) to form two bonding hybrids. However, the two hydride bonds are both so strongly polarized toward H (93%) as to have practically no contribution from Li orbitals, so the actual occupancy of extra-valent 2pu orbitals ( 0.03< ) remains quite small in this case. [Pg.288]

However, we have shown how the 18-electron rule is commonly satisfied in the absence of any significant p-orbital participation, on the basis of hypervalent 3c/4e cu-bonding interactions wholly within the framework of normal-valent sd" hybridization. Results of NBO and Mulliken analyses of high-level wavefunctions for transition-metal complexes commonly exhibit only paltry occupation of the outer p orbitals (comparable in this respect to the weak contributions of d-type polarization functions in main-group bonding). [Pg.571]

For symmetry-based qualitative molecular-orbital analyses of molecular shapes in the limit of strong metal s- and d-orbital participation in bonding, see R. B. King, Inorg. Chem. 37 (1998), 3057 and C. A. Bayse and M. B. Hall, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121 (1999), 1348. [Pg.575]


See other pages where Bonding orbital participation is mentioned: [Pg.157]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.801]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.514]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.24]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.45 , Pg.53 ]




SEARCH



Bond participations

Carbon bonding, /-orbital participation

Chemical bonding with participation 4/-orbitals

D Orbitals, participation in covalent bond

D Orbitals, participation in covalent bond formation

Metal bonding, /-orbital participation

© 2024 chempedia.info