Bonding ionic bond model

Broken Bond Model were developed to describe the process of ionization of ionic compounds, especially under primary oxygen-ion bombardment - or gas admission ("O2... 

Reactions of UCI4 with [Li RC(NCy)2 (THF)]2 (R = Me, Bu ) in THF gave the tris(amidinate) compounds [RC(NCy)2]3UCl that could be reduced with lithium powder in THF to the dark-green homoleptic uranium(lll) complexes [RC(NCy)2]3U. Comparison of the crystal structure of [MeC(NCy)2]3U with those of the lanthanide analog showed that the average U-N distance is shorter than expected from a purely ionic bonding model. ... 

Chapter 1 discusses classical models up to and including Lewis s covalent bond model and Kossell s ionic bond model. It reviews ideas that are generally well known and are an important background for understanding later models and theories. Some of these models, particularly the Lewis model, are still in use today, and to appreciate later developments, their limitations need to be clearly and fully understood. 

However, at first sight the ionic-resonance model would not seem applicable to I3- and related symmetric hypervalent species, because extreme I+I ionicity differences would not be expected between central and terminal atoms of intrinsically equal electronegativity. Nevertheless, we shall show that the complementary bidirectional resonance stabilization motif (3.188) can lead to effective three-center bonding even if central and terminal atoms are of equal electronegativity. 

Of course, in a purely formal manner we could also treat covalent Fb bond formation in terms of the interaction between FI and Fl+, but such a two-electron ionic DA model is less accurate (i.e., requires larger perturbative corrections) than the electroneutral model of complementary one-electron DA interactions to be employed in this work. 

The nature and extent of /-orbital participation in the bonding of uranocene and other bis(cyclooctatetraenyl) actinides has never been satisfactorily established, although a good deal of effort has been expended on it. The X-ray structures do not resolve the issue because an ionically bonded model would also lead to a sandwich-type structure (for example, MgCp2 has essentially the same structure as ferrocene). Other physical techniques have been used, but the complexity of the electronic structures often leads to ambiguous interpretations. 

Fig. 3. Schematic bonding in ClFg- as explained by a semi-ionic 3c-4e bond model.

The reader s attention is drawn to the discussion in Sections 14.3 and 14.4 which shows that all chemical bond models are equivalent because they all reduce to this same topological description. The derivation here is based on the ionic model because it is the simplest and most convincing. 

Bonding Models in Inorganic Chemistry 1. Ionic Compounds... 

---