Bond lengths carbonyl complexes

Weakening of the C-0 bond in carbonyl complexes by a donation and n acceptance would be expected to cause this distance to increase. Such an increase in bond length is found in complexes containing CO, with C-0 distances of approximately 115 pm for many neutral carbonyl complexes. Although such measurements provide definitive measures of bond distances, in practice it is far more convenient to use infrared spectra to obtain data on the strength of C-0 bonds.4... 

The double-bond length in 1,3-butadiene is 0.134 nm, and the ingle-bond, 0.148 nm. Since normal carbon—carbon single bonds are 0.154 nm, this indicates the extent of double-bond character in the middle single-bond. Upon complexing with metal carbonyl moieties like Fe(CO)2, the two terminal bonds lengthen to 0.141 nm, and the middle bond shortens even more to 0.145 nm (18). 

Bond lengths (Continued) carbonyl complexes dioxygen complexes disulphur complexes dithiocarbamates Mlerene complexes halide complexes halides... 

The force constants of the Ni—P bond in P " nickel carbonyl complexes increase in the order MeaP < PHg < P(OMe)a < PFs. This order is different from that of the donor-acceptor character, as estimated from uco-The lengthening of the P—O bond of triphenylphosphine oxide upon complexation with uranium oxide has been estimated by i.r. spectroscopy. However, A -ray diffraction shows little difference in the P-O bond lengths (see Section 7). Some SCF-MO calculations on the donor-acceptor properties of McaPO and H3PO have been reported. 

The osmium-carbyne carbon bond lengths for the three complexes do not differ significantly, and reference to Table IV indicates that these distances are distinctly shorter than the characterized metal-carbon double bonds of osmium carbene and carbonyl complexes. In both osmium alkylidene and carbyne complexes, then, the metal-carbon multiple bond lengths are largely insensitive to changes in the metal electron density (cf. Section IV,B). 

Figure 3. Structures A and B of the (H)2Co(CHO)(CO)s complex. The numbers are optimized bond lengths (in A) at stage one. The carbonyl ligands were held fixed at 1.09A, the optimized value from the stage one calculations on HCo(CO)k.

Figure 4.101 displays the subtle variations in metal-carbonyl bond lengths in the group 6 M(CO) complexes. In each case one can clearly distinguish the coordinate omc bonds (solid lines) from the hypervalent toMc prebonds (dashed lines). The latter are about 0.1A longer, but exhibit a similar vertical variation within the group. 

Further examples of coordinate bonds are found in metal carbonyl complexes. Metal carbon (carbon monoxide) bond distances in a selection of (first-row) transition-metal carbonyls and transition-metal organometallics are examined in Table 5-11. As expected, Hartree-Fock models do not perform well. The 6-3IG model is clearly superior to the STO-3G and 3-2IG models (both of which lead to completely unreasonable geometries for several compounds), but still exhibits unacceptable errors. For example, the model shows markedly different lengths for the axial and equatorial bonds in iron pentacarbonyl, in contrast to experiment where they are nearly the same. Hartree-Fock models cannot be recommended. 

---