ASCF

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of atomic core levels (XPS or ESCA) is a very powerful tool for characterization of the chemical surrounding of atoms in molecules. In particular, since the method is very surface sensitive, it is possible to monitor the first stages of the interface formation, i.e., in our case the interaction between individual metal atoms and the polymer. Standard core level bonding energies are well known for common materials. However, in our case, we are studying new combinations of atoms and new types of structures for which there are no reference data available. In order to interpret the experimental chemical shifts it is useful to compare with theoretical estimates of the shifts. 

Given the HF single determinant wavefunction of an iV-electron system, the Koopmans theorem29 states that the energy required to produce an (2V-l)-single determinant wavefunction by removing an 

Szabo and Ostlund, Modem Quantum Chemistry (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988). 

Ah initio Methods in Quantum Chemistry, I. Prigogine and S. A. Rice (Eds.), (John Wiley and Sons, 1987). 

Sutcliffe, Fundamentals of computational chemistry, in Computational Techniques in Quantum Chemistry, G. H. E. Diercksen, B. T. Sutcliffe and A. Veillard (Eds) (Reidel, Boston, 1975). 

---

Thus, the combined experimental and theoretical results indicate that the chemical shift observed for the S(2p) core level, of about 1.6 eV, should be due to a secondary effect from the attachment of Al atoms to the adjacent carbon atoms. Indeed, this is fully consistent with tib initio Hartree-Fock ASCF calculations of the chemical shifts in aluminum-oligolhiophene complexes 187], From calculations on a AI2/a-3T complex, where the two AI atoms are attached to the a-car-bons on the central thiophene unit, the chemical shift of the S(2p) level for the central sulfur atom is found to be 1.65 eV, which is in close agreement with the experimental value of about 1.6 eV [84]. It should be pointed out that although several different Al-lhiophene complexes were tested in the ASCF calculations, no stable structure, where an Al atom binds directly to a S atom, was found [87]. 

The usual initial guess, Cp -I- Epp(cp), usually leads to convergence in three iterations. Relationships between diagonal self-energy approximations, the transition operator method, the ASCF approximation and perturbative treatments of electron binding energies have been analyzed in detail [17, 18]. 

The ionization potential (7.9 eV) falls right outside the bracket of experimental IP s reported for carbon clusters with 40 to 100 atoms (6.42 eV IP 7.87 eV, Ref. 11). Inclusion of correlation effects will lower the calculated ASCF IP by 0.25 to 0.50 eV, so that the corrected IP will be at the upper end of the experimental IP>bracket. Due to the diffuseness of the n orbital from which an electron is removed, the correlation error in the ASCF value will be smaller than in cases where an electron is removed from a well localized bond. In these cases a correction of 1 eV is usually applied. 

Experimental Eq AEq Koopmans Theorem A b ASCF AEq Relax n. Energy... 

Gopalaratnam. V.S. and Shah. S P (1987). Tensile failure of steel fiber-reinforced mortar. ASCF.. 1. Fng. Mech. 113, 635-652. 

As can be seen, generally all electron affinities predicted by ASCF are negative, indicating a more stable neutral system with respect to the anion. The inclusion of correlation via CCSD(T) and NOF approximates them to the available adiabatic experimental EAs, accordingly with the expected trend. The EAs tend to increase in moving from ACCSD(T) to ANOF and then from ANOF to the experiment. It should be noted that the NH anion is predicted to be unbound by CCSD(T), whereas the positive vertical EA value via NOE corresponds to the bound anionic state. 

In one method, arsenic(III) chloride (AsCf, boiling temperature 376 K) is used to transport gallium vapour to the reaction site where gallium arsenide is deposited in layers. The reaction involved is ... 

Koopmans theorem can be formally applied to electron affinities (EAs) as well, i.e., the EA can be taken to be the negative of the orbital energy of the lowest unoccupied (virtual) orbital. Here, however, relaxation effects and correlation effects both favor the radical anion, so rather than canceling, the errors are additive, and Koopmans theorem estimates will almost always underestimate the EA. It is thus generally a better idea to compute EAs from a ASCF approach whenever possible. 

A substantial body of data exists evaluating the utility of DFT (and other methods) for computing ionization potentials and electron affinities following a ASCF approach. These data are summarized over four different test sets in Table 8.4. The conclusions one may... 

In DFT, Koopmans theorem does not apply, but the eigenvalue of the highest KS orbital has been proven to be the IP if the functional is exact. Unfortunately, with the prevailing approximate functionals in use today, that eigenvalue is usually a rather poor predictor of the IP, although use of linear correction schemes can make this approximation fruitful. ASCF approaches in DFT can be successful, but it is important that the radical cation not be subject to any of the instabilities that can occasionally plague the DFT description of open-shell species. 

Although ASCF methods are more likely to be successful, it is critical that diffuse functions be included in the basis set so that the description of the radical anion is adequate with respect to the loosely held extra electron. In general, correlated methods are to be preferred, and DFT represents a reasonably efficient choice that seems to be robust so long as the radical anion is not subject to overdelocalization problems. Semiempirical methods do rather badly for EAs, at least in part because of their use of minimal basis sets. 

Many of the same considerations affecting these vinylidene examples arise in comparing the relative energies of the electronic states of phenylnitrene (Figure 14.3). In this system, there are many different theoretical data available to compare to experiment, which itself is available for the lowest two singlet states. Results from ASCF calculations at the HF and DFT levels of theory are listed in Table 14.1, as are results from many additional levels that will be discussed at appropriate points later in the chapter. 

The correctness of the sequence of ionic states based on the CNDO ASCF calculations has been confirmed by studying the effect of spin—orbit coupling on the UPS of the rhenium analog HRe(CO)5 (87, 161, 174). To consider the effects of spin-orbit coupling it is necessary to employ the double group C . 

MO %Fe(3tf) A b initio (Koopmans theorem) aSCF Relaxation energy Experimental... 

MO % metal 3d character 92% of computed eigenvalue, eV ASCF Computed relaxation energy, eV Experimental ionization energy, eV... 

Experimental A b Koopmans Theorem Eb Eb ASCF eB A "b Relaxn. Energy... 

---