Anti-Darwinians

It is also apparent that the anti-Darwinian movement comes not so much from the present and past Pope, but rather from side-kick zealots - see, for example, the short editorial by Holden (Holden, 2005). As for myself, I would be more sympathetic towards the creationists camp if experimental evidence were to be provided. It is not difficult to conceive what this should be simply find equally old fossils of horses, dinosaurs, hominids, snails, cynobacteria, and sword fish. As long as this simple evidence is not forthcoming, it is probably safe to be scientifically very sceptical about the creationistic view (in this sense, it is almost funny that the creatioifists lament some small gaps in the theory of evolution). If you are interested in the creationist movement in Latin America and Mexico, in particular, see the recent article by Lazcano (Lazcano, 2005). 

In my opinion, it is the great virtue of the theory of natural selection that it made clear, for the first time, the distinction between irreducible and staggering complexity. Unfortunately, in too many minds - both Darwinian and anti-Darwinian - that... 

Darwinian evolution is kept in motion by a continual succession of newly arising variation and its modification by natural selection. The search for active substances proceeds through multiple-component simultaneous procedures, in which a restricted variant population is prepared on a microscale by a combinatorial strategy, to be subjected to the new form of selection, that is, collective screening. After a successfully applied unnatural selection of a particular variant with the desired properties, synthesis on a macroscale can take place. In Section 1.4.2.2.1 a static variation is going to be prepared and screened for anti-inflammatory... 

---