Anharmonicity vibrational configuration interaction

Starting from the normal mode approximation, one can introduce anharmonicity in different ways. Anharmonic perturbation theory [206] and local mode models [204] may be useful in some cases, where anharmonic effects are small or mostly diagonal. Vibrational self-consistent-field and configuration-interaction treatments [207, 208] can also be powerful and offer a hierarchy of approximation levels. Even more rigorous multidimensional treatments include variational calculations [209], diffusion quantum Monte Carlo, and time-dependent Hartree approaches [210]. 

Purely quantum studies of the fully coupled anharmonic (and sometimes nonrigid) rovibrational state densities have also been obtained with a variety of methods. The simplest to implement are spectroscopic perturbation theory based studies [121, 122, 124]. Related semiclassical perturbation treatments have been described by Miller and coworkers [172-174]. Vibrational self-consistent field (SCF) plus configuration interaction (Cl) calculations [175, 176] provide another useful alternative, for which interesting illustrative results have been presented by Christoffel and Bowman for the H + CO2 reaction [123] and by Isaacson for the H2 + OH reaction [121]. The MULTIMODE code provides a general procedure for implementing such SCF-CI calculations [177]. Numerous studies of the state densities for triatomic molecules have also been presented. 

Figure 15. (a) Temperature dependence of the Gibbs free energy for ice Ih (solid line) and ice Ic (dotted line) at atmospheric pressure, where contributions from the configurational entropy and anharmonic vibrations are omitted, (b) Temperature dependence of the energy which is defined as the sum of the interaction energy at its minimum structure and the vibrational energy for ice Ih (solid line) and ice Ic (dotted line). 

---