Adiabatic operation, batch limitations

There are a variety of limiting forms of equation 8.0.3 that are appropriate for use with different types of reactors and different modes of operation. For stirred tanks the reactor contents are uniform in temperature and composition throughout, and it is possible to write the energy balance over the entire reactor. In the case of a batch reactor, only the first two terms need be retained. For continuous flow systems operating at steady state, the accumulation term disappears. For adiabatic operation in the absence of shaft work effects the energy transfer term is omitted. For the case of semibatch operation it may be necessary to retain all four terms. For tubular flow reactors neither the composition nor the temperature need be independent of position, and the energy balance must be written on a differential element of reactor volume. The resultant differential equation must then be solved in conjunction with the differential equation describing the material balance on the differential element. 

Reactors (both flow and batch) may also be insulated from the surroundings so that their operation approaches adiabatic conditions. If the heat of reaction is significant, there will be a change in temperature with time (batch reactor) or position (flow reactor). In the flow reactor this temperature variation will be limited to the direction of flow i.e., there will be no radial variation in a tubular-flow reactor. We shall see in Chap. 13 that the design procedures are considerably simpler for adiabatic operation. 

Finally a fourth boundary condition shall be valid to support the worst case character of the procedure. The reaction order necessary for the formal kinetic description of a process has a severe influence on the pressure/time and respectively the tempera-ture/time-profiles to be expected. Industrial experience has shown that approximately 90% of all processes conducted in either batch or semibatch reactors can be described with a second order formal kinetic rate law. But it remains uncertain whether this statement, which is related to isothermal or isoperibolic operation with a rather limited overheating, remains valid if the reaction proceeds adiabatically and if side reactions contribute to the gross reaction rate at a much higher degree. In consequence, it shall be assumed for a credible worst case evaluation that the disturbed process follows a first order kinetics. Any reactions occurring in reality will almost certainly proceed at a much lower rate. 

---