A Quantitative Look at Information

Information is examined in quantitative terms. The ingredients necessary for quantifying are described, as are the units and interface with probability. The examples include ones based on aromatic substitution and peptide chemistry. Three types of information are illustrated. Peptide chemistry and mass spectrometry are used to establish three probability functions of wide applicability. Several tools of probability are described to close the ch q ter. Suggested exercises follow. 

---

Quantitatively, synaptic transmission is the dominant form of communication between neurons. A single look at an electron micrograph reveals that synapses with their appendant organelles, especially synaptic vesicles, are abundant in brain, whereas LDCVs are only observed occasionally (Figure 2). However, this does not mean that synaptic transmission is more important than the volume transmission pathways. The two principally different signaling pathways play distinct roles in information processing by the brain, and both are essential for brain function. 

The first chapter looked at information in the qualitative sense. A few of the exercises ventured a short distance into quantitative territory where Chapter 2 plants roots. We begin with the ingredients essential to realizing information in a quantitative way. The first of these is a venue that expresses a finite number of well-defined states. There is a lot of room to operate here, as state can be defined loosely as a way or condition of being. The face of a coin describes a way for the coin to reside on a flat surface. The face marks one state of the coin. Likewise, the diagram... 

They also suggest that for the purpose of extracting quantitative information, one should focus on the liquid-expanded phase (LE). A closer look at the DPPC monolayer EOS in the range of 80 to 90 per molecule, where the monolayer is in the pure LE phase, reveals that the electrolytes displace the EOS in an almost parallel fashion and the degree of displacement depends on anion type (in this series of experiments) (Eig. 7). 

Another way to view streamlining is through the application of the cradle-to-grave nature of LCA to look at products, processes, and activities in a more qualitative manner. This approach is also called using the life-cycle concept or life-cycle thinking. Life-cycle thinking requires the user to look upstream and downstream of the operation being studied, perhaps in an approach that combines quantitative and qualitative information. 

What then, can organic chemistry as a science draw out from quantum chemistry In the search for the answer it is useful to look at the already accumulated experience of the interactions in these closely related areas of chemical science. In the last decades there have evolved various methods for the non-empirical and semi-empirical calculations of structure and reactivity of organic molecules based on quantum mechanics. In numerous cases these calculations turned out to be of extreme usefulness in obtaining quantitative information such as the charge distribution in a molecule, the reaction indices of alternate reaction centers, the energy of stabilization for various structures, the plausible shape of potential energy surfaces for chemical transformations, etc. This list seems to include almost all parameters that are needed for the explanation and prediction of the reactivity of a compound, that is, for solving the main chemical task. Yet there are several intrinsic defaults that impose rather severe limitations on the scope of the reliability of this approach. 

In classical titration procedures one looks at the variation of the chemical composition with respect to the change of the standard concentration — utilizing a suitable signal sensitive to any shift in concentration. This variation is dependent on the equilibrium constant and hence provides quantitative information about its value. 

---