A legal doctrine

Belinfante AD, de Reede JL (2005) Beginselen van het Nederlands Staatsrecht, 15th edn. Kluwer, Deventer 

Boot GC (2006) Van boete naar relntegratie Sociaal Recht 3 91-98 Bosselaar JH, Prins R (2004) Persoonsgebonden remtegratiebudget en de gemeente ervaringen uit drie pilotprojecten. SMA 5 255-262 Braye S, Preston-Shoot M (2006) The role of law in welfare reform critical perspectives on the relationship between law and social work practice. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15 (1) 19-26 

Bruttel O, Sol E (2006) Work first as a European model Evidence from Germany and the the netherlands policy and politics, 34(1) 69-89 CPB (2007) Centraal Economisch Plan 2008. CPB, The Hague 

Damen LJA et al. (2005) Bestuursrecht. Part 1, 2nd edn. Boom Juridische uitgevers, Den Haag 

De Haan P, Drupsteen TG, Femhout R (2001) Bestuursrecht in de Sociale Rechtsstaat. Dell 1,4th edn.Kluwer, Deventer 

---

As regards conclusions on the emergence of a legal doctrine of activation - apart from work done by Noordam - we entered terra incognita in terms of analysis. This is why we finish the chapter with some legal insights. 

Contributory negligence A legal doctrine accepted in some states which provides that if a plaintiff s own negligence contributed, even in just a small way, to the plaintiff s damages, the plaintiff will not be able to recover against a negligent defendant. 

---